In A Flash

B.C. Court of Appeal Broadens Test for Family Status Discrimination

In a recent decision, the B.C. Court of Appeal has broadened the test for discrimination based on family status under the B.C. Human Rights Code.

In B.C., the longstanding test for family status discrimination was set out in HEABC v Campbell River and North Island Transition Society, 2004 BCCA 260 (the “Campbell River test”). There, the Court indicated that in “the usual case”, a prima facie case of family status discrimination is established when:

  1. a change in a term or condition of employment imposed by an employer;
  2. which results in serious interference with a substantial parental or other family duty or obligation.

In British Columbia (Human Rights Tribunal) v. Gibraltar Mines Ltd., 2023 BCCA 168, the Court reviewed the test in the context of considering employee entitlement to accommodation for caregiving obligations. The Court clarified that the first prong of the Campbell River test – a change in a term or condition of employment imposed by an employer – is not an exhaustive statement of the test for family status discrimination in employment. The first prong could also be met where an employer decides not to change a term of employment to address an employee’s need, or potentially in other circumstances.

In that case, an employee requested modifications to her and her husband’s work schedules (who worked for the same employer) to care for their son. After the employer declined to provide the accommodation, the employee filed a human rights complaint alleging discrimination based on family status. 

The employer applied to have the complaint dismissed, arguing they had not changed a term or condition of employment, and therefore the first prong of the Campbell River test could not be met. The issue made its way to the Court of Appeal for review, where the Human Rights Tribunal sought the Court’s guidance as to whether a change in the terms and conditions of employment is necessary before a prima facie case of family status discrimination is established.

The Court determined the Campbell River test does not dictate that a change to a term or condition of employment imposed by an employer is the only circumstance in which family status discrimination can be established. In addition to noting that the Court’s previous reference to “the usual case” did not create any such requirement and the B.C. Human Rights Code does not contain any such limitation, the Court cited the importance of giving statutory language relating to human rights a broad and liberal interpretation.

Given this development, B.C. employers should be aware of the potential for liability arising where a term or condition of employment results in a serious interference with a substantial parental or other family duty or obligation of an employee, even absent an employer change to the term or condition.

If you have any questions about this topic or any other questions relating to workplace law, please do not hesitate to contact a Mathews Dinsdale lawyer.

 

Print article

More insights

In A Flash

Remote Worker Dismissed Over Vaccination Status Denied EI by Federal Court

In Spears v. Canada (Attorney General), 2024 FC 329, the employee, a public servant, was dismissed for misconduct after failing to comply with her employer’s Covid-19 Vaccination Policy, despite her status as a remote worker. Her subsequent application for employment insurance (“EI”) benefits was denied. After two failed appeals, the employee brought the matter before the Federal Court on judicial review. On February 28, 2024, the Federal Court dismissed her application, thereby affirming the original decision to deny her EI benefits.

Read more
In A Flash

IRCC Announces New Entry Requirements for Mexican Citizens Travelling to Canada

On February 29, 2024, Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (“IRCC”) introduced new entry requirements for Mexican citizens travelling to Canada. As a result, most Mexican citizens will now require a Temporary Resident Visa, rather than an Electronic Travel Authorization (“eTA”), when traveling to Canada by air. This article summarizes these new entry requirements and the impact on Mexican citizens and Canadian employers.

Read more
In A Flash

Ontario Passes Fourth Working for Workers Act

On March 21, 2024, the Government of Ontario announced that it had passed the Working for Workers Four Act, 2023 (the “Act”), which implements a number of legislative amendments to several workplace laws creating further protections for workers in Ontario, as well as further obligations for employers. The changes expand on employee protections provided by a number of other Working for Workers Acts which have been passed by the Government of Ontario since 2021

Read more

Webinars

Our complimentary webinars address the practical and legal issues for Canadian employers.

View our Webinars