In A Flash

Employer Must Pay for Citizenship-Based Discrimination: Update on Haseeb and Imperial Oil

In Haseeb and Imperial Oil Limited, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the “Tribunal”) ordered the Employer to pay $101,363.16 for discrimination based on citizenship.

This decision follows up the 2018 decision where the Tribunal found that the employer had discriminated against the applicant on the ground of citizenship due to a requirement that candidates needed to be eligible to work in Canada on a permanent basis.  A summary of the earlier decision can be found in our previous In a Flash Discrimination based on Citizenship: New HRTO Decision Addresses the Convergence of Immigration and Employment Law

In coming to its decision, the Tribunal considered the applicant’s dishonesty during the hiring process.

During the hiring process, the applicant was dishonest. He had confirmed in person and by phone about his eligibility to work in Canada on a permanent basis, including stating that he had a permanent resident card and a SIN, despite not having the right at the time to work on a permanent basis in Canada. The Tribunal found that “but for the discriminatory act of asking the questions about his eligibility to work in Canada on a permanent basis, there would have been no dishonesty by the applicant”.

The Tribunal then assessed the applicant’s claims for lost income and determined that the appropriate length of time to award compensation was from March 30, 2015, the date upon which the applicant began working at his other employment, to May 3, 2019, when the applicant left that job. The employer was ordered to pay the difference in earnings over that time period.

With respect to damages for injury to dignity, feelings and self-respect, the Tribunal emphasized that where discriminatory conduct results in the loss of a job or job opportunity, damages are usually at least $15, 000 or higher. The Tribunal found that the employer’s denial of employment to the applicant in the early stages of his career was objectively serious conduct. The Tribunal noted that applicant had a “particular vulnerability as an immigrant to Canada with uncertainty as to his status at the relevant time”.

As can be seen in this case, employers need to be cognizant of potential risks under the Human Rights Code when hiring employees who are working in Canada pursuant to a work permit.  Employers should review their hiring practices and interview questions to minimize risks of potentially violating the Human Rights Code.

If you have any questions regarding such human rights risks please do not hesitate to contact a Mathews Dinsdale lawyer.

Print article

More insights

Stay informed.

Subscribe now to receive the latest developments and best practices in workplace law through relevant legal insights and business invitations to seminars, webinars and workshops.

Sign up